by Josephine Novak

February 7, 2012

The Marriage of Figaro is usually a joyous occasion, not just for the bride and groom, but very much for the audience. This Mozart opera has everything; a witty, at times rambunctious script by Lorenzo Da Ponte, based on a play by the hugely popular French playwright Pierre Augustin Beaumarchais. It captures you from the first moment with its freewheeling activity.

Figaro, the faithful servant, who facilitated his master the Count’s marriage against tough odds, is now preparing to marry his beloved Susanna, the Countess’s handmaid. Problem is the Count, who has developed a roving eye and decided that he should exert his droit de seigneur and rob Susanna of her virginity before the marriage night. The Countess, meanwhile, sad and neglected, turns for solace, though not seriously, to a young boy, Cherubino (a so-called 'trouser role' because it is sung by a woman). All manner of misunderstandings ensue and are all masterfully disentangled in an exquisite finale.

So, why was it that I felt depressed throughout the performance? Because I felt sadly let down by an opera house that has frequently thrilled me, and at the same time, I understood its dilemma, which is being shared by cultural institutions around the world: lack of money.

Until very recently, the Liceu was proudly world-class. It is a house that is not satisfied with just continuing the norms; it needs to innovate, to create and to excavate. The season’s repertoire regularly consisted of star-driven favorites, ranging from Wagner’s Ring with Placido Domingo and Deborah Voigt to L’Elisir d'Amore with Rolando Villazon. Many of the productions were joint conceptions with other leading European opera houses; they frequently sparkled and occasionally went over the top. Like most of today’s companies (the Vienna Staatsoper is a buttoned-up exception), the Liceu refused to be classical and often tortured logic by performing in totally inappropriate time-frames just for the hell of being different. But the music was exquisite, the acting and stage-direction dynamic and the standard of everything generally very high.

In between the favorites were (and still are) little-known operas resurrected from the dead or moribund, activities to spark the interest of children and create a new generation of opera-goers and an assortment of oddities that were generally most interesting.

The Liceu is still struggling to offer all of this but, alas, the money problems are becoming very visible. The difficulties have obviously been coming on for some time, but 'la crisis' has aggravated every symptom. Now the house simply cannot afford to support topflight casts, except on rare occasions or in recital. The governments of both Spain and Catalunya have had to cut back their financial support and, sadly, there has never been the tradition of massive private donations from the nouveau-very-riche, as in the United States and England, to buy their way into society. Not the most appealing method of financing art, but certainly an effective one.

by Josephine Novak

February 7, 2012

Latest Comments

  • J.Novak's review of Le Nozze di Figaro

    Sadly, I couldn't agree more. It was a disappointing production. The singers were good but not exceptional. (And the person cheering on Cherubino was very irratating.) The scenery badly lacking but the music and orchestra were impeccable. As a long-time subscriber, we are noticing the difference now due to all the financial problems. I would also agree with J.Novak's suggestions about how the Liceu should proceed in these hard times. Bring back some star performers and put on fewer but high class opera. Let's see what impression the production of La Boheme makes.

    Posted by L. North February 08, 2012 11:26:47

Add your thoughts

  

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Free newsletter
Exclusive Metropolitan Offers for readers
Barcelona Metropolitan Issue 184
Recent comments
bar guide big
Built with Metro Publisher™